I believe that when Protestantism protested and left the Roman Catholic Church, they reacted against Catholicism’s use of imagery. I believe Protestants have held an ungodly belief that “All use of images constitutes a graven image.” Their corresponding inner vow was that they would “Reject all uses of imagery in their Christian lives.” The result is that most Protestant books on systematic theology do not even include a section on dream, vision, imagination, or any other application of the eyes of one’s heart. This is startling considering that the biblical stories and actions which came as a result of dreams and visions form a section of Scripture equal in size to the entire New Testament! Their ungodly belief has given them the right to ignore one-third of the Bible.

Another fruit is that Protestants do not lead in drama, theater or the arts. Protestants have great conservative political think tanks (i.e., a left-brain function), but few great Christian performing or visual arts (i.e., a right-brain function). We need to repent of this ungodly belief and inner vow for ourselves and our forefathers, and receive all that the Bible says is ours.

On the Positive Side 

On the positive side of this question of man’s capacity to think visually, I would like to make two points.

1. All of the children and two-thirds of the adults I have polled usually picture Bible scenes as they read them. As we are picturing these Bible stories and praying for a spirit of revelation (Eph. 1:17), God causes the story to come alive and speaks to us out of it. This is essentially the same process we are describing, of setting scenes in our minds and asking God to grant us revelation, then tuning to the flow of the Holy Spirit and watching the scene come alive as God speaks to us.
2. One-fourth of the adults I have polled normally picture the scenes of songs when they worship. As God inhabits our praises, the scenes come alive and move with a life generated from the throne of God. Both of these illustrate the very process I am describing.

Man’s ability to think visually is currently being used unknowingly by many Christians, particularly those who are intuitive and visionary by nature. In reality, visual thinking is not a new thing. We are just defining and clarifying what has been happening naturally for some. As a result of this clear definition and statement, all believers can now be taught to become more sensitive to the divine flow within us.

Summary: Why Is Using the Eyes of Our Hearts Important? 

1. God has commanded us to imagine His Word (“meditate” – Josh. 1:8; I Chron. 29:18).
2. Divine creativity comes through image (Ex. 25:9-22; 35:35).
3. When God reasons, He uses imagery (Is. 1:18).
4. When Jesus taught, He used imagery (Matt. 13:34).
5. As Jesus lived, He ministered out of vision (Jn. 5:19,20).
6. God has declared that one of the primary ways He communicates with us is through dream and vision (Num. 12:6; Acts 2:17).
7. God counsels us through our dreams at night (Ps. 16:7).
8. Sight is better than blindness (Jesus healed the blind – Mk. 10:46-52).
9. The Lord’s Supper utilizes imagery (“This is My blood, this is My body, do this in remembrance of Me” – Jn. 6:53,54; I Cor. 11:23-25).
10. Personal transformation occurs while we look into the spiritual realm (II Cor. 3:18; 4:18).
11. Pictures are powerful and produce heart faith (Gen. 15:1,5,6).
12. The Bible is full of pictures, dreams, visions, metaphors, similes, parables, and images (Genesis through Revelation).
13. Our prayers are to be full of imagery (Ps. 23).
14. Our worship is to be full of imagery (Ps. 36:5,6).

A large body of scientificstudies, exhaustively reviewed, has produced a long list of possibilities. Nobody can say that any of the items on the list are certain to happen. But all the world’s climate experts, virtually without dissent, agree that the impacts listed below are more likely than not to happen. For some items, the probabilities range up to almost certain.

The following are the likely consequences of warming by a few degrees Celsius—that is, what we may expect if humanity manages to begin restraining its emissions soon, so that greenhouse well before the end of this century. By 2007, many of the predicted changes were observed to be actually happening 

* Most places will continue to get warmer, especially at night and in winter. The temperature change will benefit some regions while harming others—for example, patterns of tourism will shift. The warmer winters will improve health and agriculture in some areas, but globally, mortality will rise and food supplies will be endangered due to more frequent and extreme summer heat waves and other effects. Regions not directly harmed will suffer indirectly from higher food prices and a press of refugees from afflicted regions.

* Sea levels will continue to rise for many centuries. The last time the planet was 3°C warmer than now, the sea level as roughly 5 meters higher. That submerged coastlines where many millions of people now live, including cities from New York to Shanghai. The rise will probably be so gradual that later generations can simply abandon their parents’ homes, but a ruinously swift rise cannot be entirely ruled out. Meanwhile storm surges will cause emergencies.

 * Weather patterns will keep changing toward an intensified water cycle with stronger floods and droughts. Most regions now subject to droughts will probably get drier (because of warmth as well as less precipitation), and most wet regions will get wetter. Extreme weather events will become more frequent and worse. In particular, storms with more intense rainfall are liable to bring worse floods. Mountain glaciers and winter snowpack will shrink, jeopardizing many water supply systems. Each of these things has already begun to happen in some regions.

* Ecosystems will be stressed, although some managed agricultural and forestry systems will benefit, at least in the early decades of warming. Uncounted valuable species, especially in the Arctic, mountain areas, and tropical seas, must shift their ranges. Many that cannot will face extinction. A variety of pests and tropical diseases are expected to spread to warmed regions. Each of these problems has already been observed in numerous places.

* Increased carbon dioxide levels will affect biological systems independent of climate change. Some crops will be fertilized, as will some invasive weeds (the balance of benefit vs. harm is uncertain). The oceans will continue to become markedly more acidic, gravely endangering coral reefs, and probably harming fisheries and other marine life.

 * There will be significant unforeseen impacts. Most of these will probably be harmful, since human and natural systems are well adapted to the present climate.

The climate system and ecosystems are complex and only partly understood, so there is a chance that the impacts will not be as bad as predicted. There is a similar chance of impacts grievously worse than predicted. If the CO₂ level keeps rising to well beyond twice the pre-industrial level along with a rise of other greenhouse gases, as must inevitably happen if we do not take strong action soon, the results will certainly be worse—probably including a radical reorganization and impoverishment of many of the ecosystems that sustain our civilization.

I am writing this in line up with my previous post of Global Warming.This day is a significant one for our thinking about climate change , with the latest British Government notice now suggesting that average summer temperature in the UK will increase by as much as 6C,with peaks in London over 40C. These changes will have an enormous impact on our wildlife. Parts of our green and pleasant land could become dry and dusty within decades and some of our native species will face a major struggle for survival. A few animals like capercaillie, mountain ringlet or mountain hare are facing extinction if climate change takes hold in the way thats is predicted.But most wildlife will adopt to the climate if we help it by improving habitate in step with the climate.

Together land and oceans absorb half os all all green house gas emissions. Urban green spaces help cool built-up areas by upto 4C and better protected upland rivers can increaase the supply of fresh drinking water. Conserving a healthy natural environment is therefore not only morrally correct, it is also cost -effective action preparing our globe for the effects of global warming. Viewed in this light we are ill prepared for the challenges ahead.we have put  in place some spectacularly high hurdles in the way of our ability to respond to environmental challenge.

Protecting and working with nature makes economic sense and can be done now. Continuing to rely on undeveloped technologies as a safety net for climate change would be a disaster.

By

Livz

Global warming has been a major problem for the past 50 years, Gases like carbon dioxide , nitrous oxide and methane that make our lives possible seem to threaten our very existance.Of these, the emission of carbon dioxide is the main cause for global warming.Forests play a key role in the ecological system.It is the trees and plants which inhale carbon dioxide and release oxygen and thus re create the quality of air we breathe.

It is easy for to cut down a tree, but not so to grow one. we burn fossil fuels, resulting in the release of plenty of carbon dioxide. Many of us still dont know its ill-effects.Many developed nations seem hesitant to take drastic steps to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions.Many a meeting aimed at doing so has failed because of this attitude.

I feel, the extreme high temperature is because of this global warming. If u got to blame on some one, that could be you.We march ahead with the development of new technolgy and methodology at the cost of some precious things ,endangering.

by

Joellivz

Lets start solving…the Unanswered…..